MMODELYST
Papers/Revisiting Privacy Preservation in Brain-Computer Interfaces: Conceptual Boundaries, Risk Pathways, and a Protection-Strength Grading Framework
PAP

Revisiting Privacy Preservation in Brain-Computer Interfaces: Conceptual Boundaries, Risk Pathways, and a Protection-Strength Grading Framework

May 12, 2026

arXiv
Abstract

Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) are moving rapidly from laboratory research into clinical, edge, and real-world settings. Under ISO/IEC 8663:2025, a BCI is a direct communication link between central nervous system activity and external software or hardware systems. This link expands privacy risk beyond raw neural-signal leakage: neural data, derived representations, model assets, and decoded outputs can be re-associated with individuals across collection, transmission, storage, training, inference, and feedback, or used to infer information beyond what a task requires. Starting from the general BCI paradigm, this review deffnes privacy-protection boundaries, protection objects, and the relationship between user data privacy and model privacy within a shared risk pathway. It then proposes a three-dimensional framework - protection object, lifecycle stage, and dominant protection-strength level - to classify existing work into four levels of protection strength. Finally, mental privacy and neuroethical risks are treated as open issues, emphasizing that BCI privacy protection should not only obscure data but also disentangle task-irrelevant sensitive information while preserving downstream utility. Keywords: Brain-computer interface, Neural data privacy, User data privacy, Model privacy, Disentanglement of task-irrelevant sensitive information, Protection-strength grading, Neuroethical risks

Select text to highlight · click a highlight to remove · saved in this browser only
Authors
Lei Sun, Xiuqing Mao, Shuai Zhang, Qingyu Zeng, Min Zhao, Jiyuan Li, Wenle Dong
Your notes (browser-local)
saved
arXiv:2605.11386